Thursday, April 07, 2005

Isn't it Ironic??

A few many years ago, Alanis Morissette wrote a very popular song about irony.

The irony of it was, many of the things she singled out as ironic weren't actually ironic. They were merely unfortunate--like having a black fly in your Chardonnay. Irony only happens when the result is not what was intended, especially if it's absurd or funny.
And that's why it's ironic when people misuse this word.



Let's get literal
When people say things such as, "His breath literally knocked me dead," I wonder for a minute how they managed to come back to life without looking, u noe--rotten. And then I realize that they're using literally when they mean figuratively.
If something literally happens, it means that it actually happens. It's ridiculous to say "literally" when u mean the opposite.
The best way to avoid this language mangling is to keep the word literal out of your sentences unless u really mean it, and u want your listener to know the cat really did jump three feet in the air when it saw the dog.


Disregard for the dictionary
Irregardless is not a word, regardless of the fact that people sometimes use it as one.

Be accurate, more or less
There's a difference between less and fewer--and if you use these words correctly, you will really sound like you've got a high-powered brain sitting atop your shoulders.
Use fewer when you're talking about things that can be counted, such as individual hairs and snowflakes. Use less when you're talking about things that refer to general quantities, such as hair and snow.



Use your head
Use and utilize generally mean the same thing. Why use those extra letters if you don't need to? Most words ending in -ize should be euthanized.

A unique kind of error
Unique means "one of a kind." Therefore, despite what the salesman tells you, something can't be "completely unique." It either is unique, or it isn't. Just like it's unanimous, or it's not. Or there is consensus, or there isn't. (just like when someone says "general consensus"-- isn't consensus something that's general=majority??) haha, unless u mean General consensus-- in gladiator, u noe, that guy)

Once your ears get sensitive to this mistake, you'll hear it and related mistakes everywhere. (i dunno if it's a bad habit or something)
What's up with Aussie's Channel 10 promoting "all new" episodes of their TV shows? Does this mean that some shows are only partially new? (Trust me, they feel only partially new.)

Could you care less?
Is sounding smarter something you still could care less about?
If you couldn't care less, I would be worried. Unless, of course, you cared so little that you didn't care enough to care less. Gulp.
So there you have it.

Beg to differ
Some people think i have horrible english.. and i agree- for the large part of this post i've tried to type U as "You" and exclude the excessive use of shortcut/MSN/chat lingo, but i fail disastrously. My dad refuses to believe that he's paying for my university education, only to have me email him in my singlish, half-broken jargon (if that even qualifies as a classification)- best part is that i'm doing an English major- what a joke.

7 comments:

efarmer said...

Its a very interesting post, but i have to disagree with the idea of a correct way of speaking. Its just a quirk purists have that you must speak English 'correctly'. Certain lingos like Singlish and Ghetto thrash talk will never have its place in society if people said it was wrong. The fact is if i keep using irregardless literally, it would soon become completely unique. And THEN, the dictionary has to change its meaning. Its not the dictionary defining the way a language is used contrary to belief, its how society uses it which compels linguists to change how the dict defines a word. For example, a phenomena now is the word 'street' being pronounced with the 'ch' sound as in 'church'. Do you do it? is it wrong?

efarmer said...

As for the irony part, basically i think its unfair to criticise song writers on technical terms that lack clear definition. (if you running to a dictionary now to check a term then you shld read my earlier post). This Morisette song with irony has been debated for way too long. And when the song first came out, some even thot the irony part was indeed just the song title, which makes it a great song. haha. I read somewhere some hippies defended Morisette with this claim which i esp liked.
However, she was interviewed herself and i suggest reading this very long but highly informative article. There are many definitions of ironic but of course you can say thats going too far. But the good thing about this site is the guy ruthlessly dissects articles criticising Morisette's lyrics and insults them back for not knowing the true Greek origins of irony themselves. A warning is, after reading this you might just hate arts people or never use the word 'ironic' again. But i loved the arguments. First class 'Whos got the better erudite nonsense'? http://www.geocities.com/eirig/

Mishi said...

wah, don't kill me abel *shudders*

dexter said...

Hmmm,.....with respect to the above argument i have to say that the song 'irony''s intended meaning may not have been even what Alanis Morisette even intended. Maybe all she wanted was to amplify the word 'Irony'..and make all of these purists, intellectual wannabes, bla bla think that they managed to decipher what the word 'irony' is and get all interested/ mentally challenged while doing so..when all she probably did was to sit in her arm chair and say "look at those sad sad people.."....For example, the word 'lah' in the Singaporean context is related to an after thought, something that comes directly after a sentence. But what does Lah really mean..? The 'word' love is used to describe a feeling but it can't be really described...we love to label things..give things meaning...but it doesn't really depict that the feeling of 'love' really means....Likewise...Irony...the question is not so much what is irony..but irony to what extent?

In response to abel's first post I believe that culture does play a very important role in determining what is linguistically saavy or 'right' or 'wrong' or even in this case..the meanings of words are interwoven within culture.

Okay...I've written all of this to prove that

dexter said...

Im so bored......

Anonymous said...

great timing.
the word efficient has been on my mind.

the definition:

Acting directly to produce an effect.

Acting or producing effectively with a minimum of waste, expense, or unnecessary effort.

the problem:

its annoying how pple think efficient means fast.. they forget the PROPER (EFFECTIVE) part. they just "chop-chop" do, and leave the whole thing in pieces.. left-over pieces are definitely not effective.

you think?

Mishi said...

whoa... yea, effectiveness/ efficiency: (thesaurus meanings) competent, productive, useful.

none of these words probably use the notion of speed, or maybe cos we associate productivity with speed in this mass society.

guess it's a societal meaning that we place on the week. like wad Abel mentioned, society compels this meaning upon the word... and sooner or later everyone accepts it as it is represented. *sigh*